Memphis Taproom/Local 44/Resurrection Raid, cont’d
Yesterday’s report about the State Police beer raid drew an incredible amount of response. Last time I checked, my Day 1 story had drawn more than 350 comments.
Here’s the Day 2 report from my colleague, Bob Warner, in which the state’s ranking Republican on the House liquor committee calls it “a ridiculous use of manpower.”
Here’s my latest take on the raid, which echoes some of the observations I shared yesterday - mainly that beer has changed, and the laws haven’t kept up.
I did a live studio interview about it all with NBC10 yesterday afternoon, but I can’t find it online. Maybe somebody’ll send me a link.
Fox29 chimed in here. Note Sgt. William LaTorre suggesting that if his guys confiscated any properly registered beer, it was the PLCB’s fault. He also claims the beer is being kept at “cellar temperature.” And Action News does a spot here, with Sgt. LaTorre basically agreeing that the bars are guilty until they prove themselves innocent.
If you have the time to read, there are some pretty good discussions about the episode at Beer Advocate and Lew Bryson’s NOPLCB and Jack Curtin’s Liquid Diet, especially in this post.
Other bloggers have noticed, including Jay Brooks out in Californy. Here’s the chatter at the Brew Lounge, FooBooz, Philly Speaks/West Philly & /Food & Drink.
March 9th, 2010 at 7:25 am
speak up be active:
The PA General Assembly-Find your legislator:
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/home/find.cfm
The PLCB: RA-LBconsumer@state.pa.us
March 9th, 2010 at 9:53 am
Don, are you aware if any St. Bernardus was confiscated? I ask because I see a change in today’s registered brands at PLCB.
St Bernardus Witbier & St Bernardus Pater 6 of yesterday are now registered as
St. Bernardus Witbier & St. Bernardus Pater 6 today
God help us all if any of this was confiscated as a result of a missing period. Sounds unlikely, but unlikelier things have happened?